When it comes to Dyke Construction and the function of ‘linear earthworks’ we call ‘Dykes’, there is massive confusion amongst both professionals and amateur archaeologists about how such structures could function when they are dry today?
The perception of these ‘Dykes’ is they are ‘rivers’ like the Thames following uphill over hills or Victorian Canals with locks and gates regulating the flow of the water – which are both equally nonsensical as a prehistoric structure. Basic Hydrology that most people (should be but not necessarily) learnt at school is that water is under the ground – not just a little water but 30% of all the fresh water on the planet.
This abundance of ‘groundwater’ is evident as it is the source of ALL rivers and supplies the Wells that have been dug since the beginning of time when rivers were absent. Even today, if you go into your garden and dig a hole, it will eventually fill with groundwater, whether in a valley or on top of a hill or mountain.
How and why water is on hills is very challenging for individuals as most people have a simplistic view of water being flat and sitting at ground level – but the earth is a far more complicated structure as this is the reason that it took centuries for people to recognise that we lived on a sphere and not a ‘flat-earth’ as such concepts as gravity are hard to comprehend.
The reality is that ‘streams’ of water are encapsulated within the bedrock allowing ‘mountain springs’ to start rivers at a great height as groundwater is under pressure and erupts to the surface from BELOW and does not flow up or down the hill internally – but will flow downhill AFTER it escapes from the soil.
The above illustration shows that if wells are dug halfway up a hill where there is a water pocket then they will fill – if we join up these wells then the entire ditch will also fill with water – sourced from the ground.
The Engineering and Hydrology
The central aspect that must be remembered when considering the reasons behind the construction and maintenance of these earthworks (Dykes) is that the environment was so much different in the Mesolithic Period, which changed rapidly when entering the Neolithic and then even more changes in the Bronze and Iron Ages.
Once the ice sheets had melted and the climate began to warm, the landscape gradually changed from open tundra to dense woodland. By around 8000 BC, pine and birch dominated the woodland cover. These were slowly replaced by lime, elm and oak with some hazel. By 6500 BC, pine and birch woodland would only have been found on the thinner limestone soils of the uplands.
With up to 90% of the land covered in woodland of one sort or another, the Mesolithic people needed all the open ground they could find to hunt larger animals like deer using their flint tipped bows and arrows. The lakes also provided plenty of minor game such as birds and fish.
We know that the hunters were here because archaeologists have collected thousands of their flint artefacts from sites around both lakes. Recent fieldwork and excavation by Bradford University around Malham Tarn has thrown more light on the people who used it as a hunting base. It seems that in the later Mesolithic, people were camping out on areas of slightly raised ground close to the shore of the Tarn. Geophysical survey work has shown that at one of these camp sites, there are several possible hearths.
Charcoal has also been found in Mesolithic contexts in the wetlands above the Tarn. It seems likely that the hunters burned back the edge of the woodland in order to create more open ground for their prey to graze on. This would also have favoured the growth of hazel since, unlike other woodland trees, hazel grows back quickly from a burnt stump. With hazelnuts being a significant winter food source at this time, the people may have had this aim in mind too. People had begun to alter their environment, and it was the beginning of the end of the wildwood in the Neolithic Period.
Consequently, at the time of the construction of Dykes the water table was still high, and rivers and wetlands dominated the landscape. When looking at the landscape of these Dykes (particularly our case studies of Offa and Wansdyke) we notice that the earthworks is not consistent or continuous.
Fell walkers who have followed these features on foot have trouble accepting that these were canals that have been abandoned long ago and hence are just a shadow of their former self.
But if we look at other known abandoned canals from just a mere 100 years since their abandonment, we see there look remarkably the same, and even today, people find it hard to accept these once were part of a massive ‘super highway’ of the Victorian era that linked cities of trading together – like our ancestors dykes.
The gradients of some of the valleys these features enter have given walkers great concern that if water had been within the ditch, it would all run away to the bottom of the valley, leaving the canal ditch dry and useless.
The problem with this analysis is that the walkers rely on OS maps that show these dykes as continuous features – but the reality if we look at the scheduling of these monuments through Historic England, this is far from the truth. As we have shown in the case studies, most of these earthworks stop at the top of the valley hill and continue on the other side as if there was something in between?
What we find is that there is indeed something, and it’s called water, as, at the time of construction, the river levels were higher, and these valleys would have been flooded. So, they would paddle across the riven.
Moreover, what we see added at a later date are extensions to the original dyke to follow the falling river levels down the valley in sections and to a different specification to the above initial earthwork. This can be shown on the section of Offa’s Dyke just outside Chepstow, where the dyke enters the valley but seems to stop at the top and then other partitions are added later.
In above GE photo, we see that the extracts of Offa’s Dyke that enters the dry river valley changes in character except for one aspect – the width of the bank.
So, what makes the width of the bank so important?
The width gives us a clear view of how over time, the use of this earthwork changed. What we see today is not what was initially built in prehistoric times – then the ditch was of greater importance, and then as the water table fell over many millenniums, the bank became of great significance and adapted.
The bank needs not to be so vast unless it has changed from being a towpath (only 2 – 3m wide) to a road that took two-way traffic?
Interestingly it is now the same width as a standard Roman Road (5m – 10m). We see from our Offa example that the road is 6m – 14m and only 0.4m to 1m in height. This suggests that the Dykes purpose changed in later use, and looking at the 1800 OS map; this is confirmed as Offa’s Dyke is marked as ‘ancient road’.
This would explain why the ditch became more shallow down the dry valley, and on the Historic England monument reports there are a copious number of ‘Pits’ were found next to Bank, indicating that the contents of these pits were used to widen the road later than the original ditch.
We can only speculate that the ditch, which is only half to a third of the size of the ditch outside the dry river valley area, was still used as a canal or was entirely abandoned eventually for a road when the water table diminished?
Looking at how the Victorian engineers used locks to go up and down hills does give us an alternative possibility to this road use. For we have this strange mystery of why only ‘separate sections’ survive in dry river valleys – this example is not an exception but more of the rule.
Is it possible that this sectioning was quite deliberate, and if so, what could be the reason? Well, a clue may come from an unusual source – Stonehenge. If you look at the excavation reports, you see Stonehenge is not a continuous ditch but a series of pits and chalk walls. These walls maybe use to stabilise the level of the water and if so, is the same engineering design being found here?
If we cut small sections of Dyke and leave a small wall in between the cuttings, you have your modern Canal lock system – the only defence is that you would need to drag the boat over the surface between segments of the canal by leaving a low grove in the wall.
Or if this option was not possible, they have used the tried and tested method of hauling boats up and down hills – by hand.
Where ‘Springs ‘ do sprung!!
Recent investigations into another prehistoric Dyke that the Romans reused called the Vallum by Hadrian’s Wall have shown that Dykes can not only trap water as previously shown into smaller trough ditches of water to go up and down hills, they can also place the Dyke over or close to ‘Springs’ to allow the ditch to replenish its loss of water due to the gradient constantly.
People are happy with canals using locks to assist boats in climbing and descending hills. This is because it’s a simplistic system that appeals to their ‘flat water’ perception of hydrology. However, the physics is somewhat different as all the lock does achieve a sufficient amount of water to float the boat or vessel to allow it to continue on its journey. On a river, you don’t need a lock, although you will be ascending or descending a hill in many cases, and this is achieved by replacing the water going up or downhill with new water and so keeping you afloat – not rocket science?
Rivers are formed from ‘springs’ and gain greater volume from ‘runoff’ from surface water (rain) or other interacting rivers. What we have found with the Vallum (and we believe this occurs in both Offa and Wansdyke – but the investigation is still ongoing and results are expected in the autumn of 2022) is that the Dyke was constructed on top of some ‘Springs’ or within 200m of other springs (which would indicate that the water table was just under the surface) and so a ditch of 1m to 2m would fill with groundwater – but under pressure that would naturally replenish if it moved downhill like a river.
The speed of the replenishment would depend on the depth of the ditch – the deeper the ditch, the more the water as the soil/rock is removed, lessening the resistance to the water.
What has surprised us about this technique is the number of ‘springs’ that are in the vicinity or under the Dyke (Vallum) – the construction is about 70 miles long, and we have found over 65 springs associated with the struct (about one spring per mile), but these are TODAY’S reported springs – we have not taken into account (because there are no maps) the more significant number of ‘Springs’ that would have been in that Dyke construction area at the time of construction (so we could be looking at 100+ springs if not more!!) this volume of water would keep any structure supplied with water at whatever gradient it took.
To understand how these canals worked in hillsides of Britain where today they are dry and barren, you need to appreciate the landscape after the last ice age.
As we have already started the environment was coved mostly (90%) with woodland and trees. This is because there was an abundance of water on the land as the water table was increadabily high.
This made the landscape almost like a latter day tropical rainforest rather than the grassy plains we see today.
The reason for the high water table is a direct consequence of the last ice age which at its maximum about 30k years ago had most of Britain under 2 miles iof ice cap.
The melting of this 361.8 gt of water (see first chapter for details) or 67,000 inches of water per square inch – flooded the soil which it could not absorbe and so it leak out for thousands of years at all elevation levels.
This shows why rivers were at their highest level in history in the Mesolithic period and how easily it would be to find the water table if you dug a well or in this case a ditch even 7,000 – which is the current estimated date of the construction of these dykes.
This leaking of water into the environment can be found in not only the SEA LEVEL changes (Table 1) that shows this constant flow of groundwater into rivers then into the sea rising sea levels – but also in other measurement such of the age of water in the groundwater aquifers.
These dates show that water entered the groundwater table in vast quantities in the Ice Age – but stopped for six thousand years – so did it stop raining for 6,000 years? Or was more water coming out than entering the ground?
The reason for the construction of Dykes in the past is shown by the sheer volume of ‘Linear Earthworks’ found. There are 1497 Scheduled Dyke sites found covering the entire british landscape – from the Known Offa and Wansdyke to the East Coast and now we have found that the Vallum connected to Hadrian’s Wall was also once a prehistoric Dyke that was reused by the Romans to convey the stone to the Walls.
The idea that these features are Medieval (although they may have been reused at that period) in origin is impossible as they are found as far as field as Southern Ireland (a meear 147 Dykes) and on both the Shetland and Scilly Isles – too wide spread to be these so called ‘saxon’ boundary/ defensive markers.
Why do archaeologists and geologist have so much trouble understanding past river and water levels?
We have shown in our trilogy ‘The Prehistoric Britain’ that other ancient ditches of the past contained water and were feed by local ‘springs’ that feed into the current known rivers – like the River Avon next to Stonehenge, which consequently raised the Rivers water level and flooded the area at the bottom of ‘The Avenue’ known as Stonehenge bottom.
Archaeologists who have investigated if this was correct have concluded that it could not be possible or was at a much earlier date, as their expert Geologist have assured them that the about of ‘alluvium’ (sandy silt) was in sufficient in volume. Sadly, this is ‘Bad Science’ as any expert in ‘Hydrology’ would have told them – for alluvium is only produced when a river flows rapidly (due to surface runoff), cutting down rocks and stones that create this sandy silty substance.
Water from a spring, does not create ‘alluvium’ as it is from ‘Aquifers’ and not rainfall runoff – as this article from Wikipedia on chalk streams qualifies.
Chalk streams are rivers that rise from springs in landscapes with chalk bedrock. Since chalk is permeable, water percolates easily through the ground to the water table and chalk streams therefore receive little surface runoff. As a result, the water in the streams contains little organic matter and sediment and is generally very clear. The beds of the rivers are generally composed of clean, compacted gravel and flints, which are good spawning areas for Salmonidae fish species.
Since they are fed primarily by aquifers, the flow rate, mineral content and temperature range of chalk streams exhibit less seasonal variation than other rivers. They are mildly alkaline and contain high levels of nitrate, phosphate, potassium and silicate. In addition to algae and diatoms, the streams provide a suitable habitat for macrophytes (including water crowfoot) and oxygen levels are generally supportive of coarse fish populations.
Of the 210 rivers classified as chalk streams globally, 160 are in England.
Chalk is a highly porous and permeable rock, and rain falling onto chalk topography percolates directly into the ground, where the chalk layer acts as an aquifer. The groundwater flows through the chalk bedrock, re-emerging lower down the slope in springs. The chalk acts as a temporary reservoir by regulating the amount of water supplied to the springs. This is why many chalk streams in the UK have stable flow regimes that vary only slightly over time. The temperature of the emerging surface water is fairly stable and rarely deviates from 10 °C (50 °F). On cold winter mornings, water vapour from the relatively warm stream condenses in the cold air above to form fog.
Chalk is slightly soluble in rainwater because rain is naturally slightly acidic. The products of chalk weathering are dissolved in rainwater and are transported in stream flow. Chalk streams transport little suspended material (unlike most rivers), but are considered “mineral-rich” due to the dissolved calcium and carbonate ions. The surface water of chalk streams is commonly described as “gin clear”. The channel bed consists of angular flint gravel derived from the natural flint deposits found embedded within the chalk geology that contains relatively low amounts of clay and silt deposits.
The unique characteristics of chalk stream ecology are due to stable temperature and flow regimes combined with highly transparent water and lack of sand grade sediment particles.