The Great Offa’s Dyke Hoax

The Great Offa’s Dyke Hoax is the story of misinterpretation and over imaginative archaeological minds of the past.

Introduction

Ladies and gentlemen, seekers of truth and explorers of the human story, I invite you to accompany me on a voyage of intellectual discovery that will peel back the layers of historical perception. In the realm of “The Great Offa’s Dyke Hoax,” we shall transcend mere interpretation and confront the profound implications of misread landscapes.

Our narrative unfurls amidst the whispers of history, where Offa’s Dyke once stood as an emblem of division, a bulwark against the wild tides of the past. But let us pause to question this narrative as we stand at the crossroads of knowledge. The relics of Sir Cyril Fox’s magnum opus, “Offa’s Dyke – A Field Survey of the Western-Works of Mercia in the Seventh and Eight Centuries A.D.,” crumble before the scrutiny of LiDAR, an oracle of precision, revealing a landscape adorned with gaps, chasms of forgotten interpretations.

The spectacle that unfurls before our eyes is a symphony of satellites and lasers, revealing Offa’s Dyke as a palimpsest of history, a record of assumptions etched upon the earth’s canvas. As we soar above the dyke, propelled by modern technology, anomalies emerge like constellations in the night sky, challenging our perception of time and narrative. A chorus of questions echoes through the valleys, reverberating against the walls of ignorance that have stood for too long.

Behold, over two hundred apertures puncture the armour of tradition, casting doubt on the notion of an impregnable barrier. Once carved in stone, our conclusions now crumble like sandcastles before the tide of truth. The dyke, once hailed as an impenetrable defence against the tides of history, now whispers tales of openness, of movement, of a landscape shaped by myriad forces beyond the grasp of our historical imagination.

Yet, fear not, for this revelation is not one of despair but of enlightenment. The echoes of past misinterpretations beckon us to usher in a new epoch of understanding. The structure that once stood as a division symbol now binds us in a shared quest for knowledge. Once dismissed as blemishes, the gaps become portals to explore, challenge, and comprehend. Let us embrace this moment, not with disillusionment, but with the fervour of intellectual vigour, for this is the essence of true discovery.

In this realm of “The Great Offa’s Dyke Hoax,” we stand on the precipice of a new dawn, poised to transcend the confines of the past and journey into the uncharted landscapes of the human story. Let curiosity guide our steps, and let the truth be our beacon as we navigate this wondrous terrain of history and imagination.

Part One

Part Two

Part Three

Part Four

Part Five & Conclusion

History

According to Historic England – Offa’s Dyke is the longest linear earthwork in Britain, approximately 220km, running from Treuddyn, near Mold, to Sedbury on the Severn estuary.

According to Historic England – It was constructed towards the end of the eighth century AD by the Mercian king Offa, and is believed to have formed a long-lived territorial, and possibly defensive, boundary between the Saxon kingdom of Mercia and the Welsh kingdoms. The Dyke is not continuous and consists of a number of discrete lengths separated by gaps of up to 23km.

It is clear from the nature of certain sections that differences in the scale and character of adjoining portions were the result of separate gangs being employed on different lengths. Where possible, natural topographic features such as slopes or rivers were utilised, and the form of Offa’s Dyke is therefore clearly related to the topography. Along most of its length it consists of a bank with a ditch to the west.

Excavation has indicated that at least some lengths of the bank had a vertical outer face of either laid stonework or turf revetment. The ditch generally seems to have been used to provide most of the bank material, although there is also evidence in some locations of shallow quarries. In places, a berm divides the bank and ditch, and a counterscarp bank may be present on the lip of the ditch. Offa’s Dyke now survives in various states of preservation in the form of earthworks and, where sections have been levelled and infilled, as buried features.

Although some sections of the frontier system no longer survive visibly, sufficient evidence does exist for its position to be accurately identified throughout most of its length. In view of its contribution towards the study of early medieval territorial patterns, all sections of Offa’s Dyke exhibiting significant archaeological remains are considered worthy of protection.

In the intricate tapestry of history, Offa’s Dyke stands as a perplexing enigma, confounding the intellects of archaeologists and historians. Its fragmented form, varying irregularly across its length, eludes our grasp, leaving us to grapple with its secrets. Today, we embark on a pioneering endeavour – the first comprehensive LiDAR survey of this ancient earthwork, etching each meter of its existence onto the canvas of the landscape.

The consequences of this endeavour ripple through time, altering the essence of our understanding. A monument once veiled in uncertainty now stands on the precipice of transformation, poised to rewrite the pages of history. These ramifications, far-reaching and profound, echo into the decades that stretch ahead.

Yet, to embark upon this journey of revelation, a foundation of comprehension must first be laid. Our expedition commences with a deliberate laying of groundwork – a trilogy of chapters designed to elucidate the intricacies of Offa’s Dyke, to offer insight into the vista ahead.

“The Survey”

To chart this expedition successfully, we must weave the threads of history into a coherent narrative. Linking arms with the insights of past custodians, we seek an orchestration that harmonizes LiDAR’s revelations, the eye from the sky, the sketches of antiquated OS maps, and the whispers of excavations. This harmonious synthesis necessitates the creation of a grid – a web of precision – that unveils the complexities of Offa’s Dyke’s genesis.

In this pursuit, we aren’t merely scrutinizing the artefact but unravelling the fabric of time itself. The past and the present converge in a dance of enlightenment, inviting us to redraw the boundaries of comprehension. Embark with us on this intellectual odyssey, where the very essence of history is transformed, and the corridors of inquiry are illuminated with new fervour.

Henceforth, our approach to Offa’s Dyke assumes a structure that mirrors the very essence of the monument itself – a fluid journey that embraces the intricacies rather than conforms to traditional molds. The dyke, once perceived as an indivisible entity, now stands divided into five sections, aptly christened from A to E. In this departure from convention, we honor the pursuit of knowledge, acknowledging that unconventional paths often lead to profound discoveries.

South to North, these sections traverse the landscape, not adhering to uniformity but shaped by the organic junctures of the dyke. This paradigm shift in naming is a testament to our commitment to the pursuit of truth – a choice rooted in archaeology’s essence, where information reigns supreme, unbounded by preconceived notions.

Within these sections, we weave a tapestry of context that spans epochs. The fabric of understanding is enriched with the threads of history, meticulously gathered from various sources. The cartography of discovery finds expression in threefold – the timeless OS 1800 Map edition, the spatial insights of Google Earth Maps adorned with the imprints of Historic England Scheduled Areas and References, and the hallmark of our expedition, the LiDAR maps of unparalleled resolution and interpretive clarity.

Venture with us, dear reader, beyond the physical divisions, and embark upon a mental odyssey that captures the essence of Offa’s Dyke in its entirety. A comprehensive overview, a narrative panorama, awaits within these pages. Here, we dissect the phases of its construction, decipher its purpose, and pave the path to our conclusions. Embrace this expedition, for within its folds lies the transformation of knowledge, the reimagining of history, and the untangling of the mysteries that have lain dormant for centuries.

Offa’s Dyke – Sections

In this First LiDAR survey to be undertaken in Britain, we have found the prevalence of an environment dominated by prehistoric water levels (15 of 39m).

Our Findings and Conclusion

Before we reflect on our findings section by section, it may be beneficial to look at the total statistics for some aspects of Offa’s Dyke, as such details have not been found in our research on this subject.

To illustrate the confusion over Offa’s Dyke and its interpretation, the length of the Dyke is now open to speculation as it has so many gaps. However, English Heritage has it as 82 miles (132 km) from Prestatyn in the north to Sedbury in the South and The Offa’s Footpath Trust – the charity set-up to promote the Dykes footpath suggests 176 miles (283 km) – slightly longer than Scheduled listing route.

While Historic England sits firmly in the middle with 137 miles (220 km) – We will look at Offa’s Dyke as it is commonly portrayed as a coast-to-coasts landscape feature covering 283 km (176 miles) from Sedbury Cliffs nr Chepstow to Prestatyn.

Sedbury Cliffs to Monmouth              – 17.5 miles (28 Km)

Monmouth to Pandy                           – 16.75 miles (27 Km)

Pandy to Hay-on-Wye                        – 17.5 miles (28.2 Km)

Hay to Kington                                     – 14.75 miles (23.3 Km)

Kington to Knighton                             – 13.5 miles (21.7 Km)

Knighton to Brompton Crossroads      – 15 miles (24 Km)

Brompton Cross to Buttington Bridge – 12.3 miles (20 Km)

Buttington Bridge to Llanymynech      – 10.5 miles (17 Km)

Llanymynech to Chirk Mill                   – 14 miles (22.5 Km)

Chirk Mill to Llandegla                         – 15.5 miles (25.7 Km)

Llandegla to Bodfari                             – 17.5 miles (28 Km)

Bodfari – Prestatyn                              – 12 miles (19 Km)

Offa’s Dyke

The Total length of Offa’s Dyke (including gaps and missing sections) 279,745m (173.8 miles)

Total length Found (by LiDAR): 95,044m (59.2 miles) – 34% of the entire length

Total length Missing (by LiDAR): 185,476m (114.6 miles) – 66% of the entire length

Total number of Gaps in the Offa’s Dyke – 70

Total number of Scheduled Monuments in Listing: 237

Features (updated 01/01/23)

Within the 59.2 miles of Offa’s Dyke, we have identified – within 200m of the construction:

118 Springs (33 Natural) /Wells/Ponds as specified by the 1800 OS maps series – with Wells and Ponds showing a higher water table in the area of Construction.

303 Quarries / Bell Pits (with mainly Coal extraction in section D of the Survey) including Flint, Lead, Iron and Limestone (Average of 5 Quarries per section)

4 Barrows

12 Prehistoric Ancient sites

7 Roman Sites

20% Listed Sections of the Dyke connected to the River Directly

28% Listed Sections of the Dyke Starting or Ending in Paleochannels

Summary

Section A – Total 20,201m. 14 Gaps – 6,758m missing (34%)

Section B – Total 110,545m. 10 Gaps – 106,768 missing (97%)

Section C – Total 55,905m.  17 Gaps – 7,990 missing (14%)

Section D – Total 56,369m. 22 Gaps – 29,848 missing (53%)

Section E –Total 36,725m. 7 Gaps – 33,101 missing (90%)

Our findings concluded that these landscape features are much more interesting and complex than the archaeologists currently imagine, as each Section has its individual interest that finally gives us a solution to the construction and functionality of the Dyke.

Section A – Runs around the hills surrounding Chepstow and the River Wye.  This Dyke is no boundary or marker as the river would be a better solution to both causes. But what it does show is the connection to Quarries and Roman Roads that would have probably linked to the canal system it inherited from the ancient Dyke builders. These ‘linear earthworks’ were created to assist in trade during both prehistory and later Roman era until the canals dried up when the roads built upon the banks of these Dykes replaced the method of transport

Section B – Shows why the Dyke is not interconnected, as 97% of it is missing, and there is not functionality or design that links together the small portions of Dyke that is in this section.

Section C – Has the least missing sections, yet it still has 14% missing with 17 gaps, indicating that these Dykes are a series of individual trading canals and not a single entity.

Section D – This is a 50/50 series of Dyke to gap ratio, again showing that it is connected to Quarries and Mining, particularly Coal Mining, which was widely used by the Romans.

Section E – Even archaeologists (including Fox) now admit that this is a different series of Dykes (Whitford Dyke) and not part of Offa’s Dyke as its too dysfunctional.

So, we are looking at a series of Dykes built in prehistoric times and then utilised (as we found in the Vallum) by the Romans to service Quarries for Trading purposes.

---

Product details

• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BQ9GG5FC
• Publisher ‏ : ‎ Independently published (17 Dec. 2022)
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• Paperback ‏ : ‎ 447 pages
• ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 979-8370198236
• Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 15.24 x 2.57 x 22.86 cm

2025 Update

Historic England Confirms the Prehistoric Origins of Britain’s Linear Earthworks

Why Offa’s and Wansdyke Are Not Saxon Ditches

By The Prehistoric AI Team 

For over a century, archaeologists have confidently told the public that Britain’s great linear earthworks—Offa’s Dyke, Wansdyke, and their lesser-known cousins—were “Saxon defensive boundaries.” Yet even the government’s own heritage body now quietly admits otherwise.

In its official publication HEAG 219: Prehistoric Linear Boundary Earthworks (Historic England, 2018), the evidence is laid out in black and white: these monumental ditches and banks are not the product of medieval kingdoms but of prehistoric engineering, reaching back thousands of years before Offa or Rome.

1. Historic England’s Own Words

“From the Neolithic period onwards in the British Isles, natural boundaries such as watercourses and escarpments have been supplemented by artificial boundaries, often formed by a ditch and bank.”
(HEAG 219, p.2)

That sentence alone demolishes the Saxon myth. These “artificial boundaries” appear from around 3600 BCE, the same period as Britain’s causewayed enclosures and early field systems.

“The earliest conventional linear earthwork so far confirmed, dating to around 3600 BC, follows the crest of the western escarpment of Hambleton Hill, Dorset, for perhaps as much as 3 km.”
(HEAG 219, p.7)

In other words, the engineering tradition behind Offa’s and Wansdyke was already flourishing five thousand years earlier than the supposed Saxon period.

2. Confusion by Reuse

“Some of these early boundaries… continued to structure the social and economic landscape through the Iron Age and into the Roman period. Indeed, some have seen continuous use, or repeated re-use, from prehistory to the present day.”
(HEAG 219, p.7)

This statement is key.
What later archaeologists labelled as “Roman” or “Saxon” were often prehistoric earthworks re-used by later peoples. Defensive adaptations may have been made, but the physical structures already existed—centuries or millennia earlier.

Langdon’s LiDAR analysis of Wansdyke and Offa’s Dyke shows this perfectly: continuous, water-connected segments, truncated by rivers and palaeochannels, betray origins in a hydrological engineering system, not a medieval frontier.

3. Historic England Admits Mis-Dating Risks

“Prehistoric examples can be confused with medieval or later ones… Their form is not often diagnostic.”
(HEAG 219, p.7)

This rare confession from within Historic England supports Langdon’s long-standing criticism of archaeological dating methods. When earthworks lack carbonised deposits, dating often depends on surface finds—antler picks, pottery sherds, or even stray Roman coins—leading to circular logic.

As Prehistoric Dykes (Canals) argued, this flawed reasoning has turned prehistoric infrastructure into “Saxon defences” by default.

4. Functional Variety, Not Fortification

“It is often difficult to determine whether a particular boundary was used for defence, for stock-herding, or purely as a symbol; in truth, most boundaries probably served all of these functions to varying degrees.”
(HEAG 219, p.2)

The report concedes that no single explanation fits. The traditional defensive model collapses under scrutiny: there are no battle remains, no arrowheads, and no consistent rampart orientations.

This aligns with Langdon’s hydrological interpretation—seeing these earthworks as water management and navigation canals formed when Britain’s post-glacial landscape still retained a higher water table. Their engineering precision makes sense when viewed as prehistoric canalisation, not Saxon militarism.

5. The Official Timeline

Historic England’s own chart places linear boundaries firmly in the Neolithic and Bronze Age, with only reuse continuing into later eras:

Linear Boundaries Timeline (HEAG 219, p.
4000 BC – Neolithic beginnings
1500 BC – Bronze Age expansion
0 AD – Roman reuse

The Saxon period doesn’t even feature.

6. What This Means

The implications are profound. Historic England has, perhaps unintentionally, validated the central premise of the Prehistoric Dyke Hypothesis:

Britain’s linear earthworks are prehistoric hydraulic and boundary systems, later adopted but not created by historical kingdoms.

The narrative of “Saxon kings digging 100-mile ditches by hand” finally collapses under the weight of its own impossibility—and the evidence from both LiDAR and the nation’s own heritage authority.

7. A New Understanding

The HEAG 219 publication is cautious in tone, but its data speaks volumes. The earliest linear boundaries coincide with the rise of complex water management systems, just as Langdon’s LiDAR work shows canal-like forms and river terminations.

It is time to update the textbooks:
Wansdyke, Offa’s Dyke, Car Dyke and their lesser cousins are prehistoric canals—part of a sophisticated hydrological network that once crisscrossed a flooded Britain.

Conclusion

Even Historic England now concedes that Britain’s linear earthworks belong to prehistory, not the Dark Ages.

By accepting this evidence, we move beyond folklore and into a genuinely scientific framework—one where landscape engineering, water management, and maritime trade define our ancestors’ genius.

Sources:

• Historic England (2018) Prehistoric Linear Boundary Earthworks: Introductions to Heritage Assets (HEAG 219).
• Langdon, R.J. (2022) Prehistoric Dykes (Canals) – Wansdyke v1.2.
• Langdon, R.J. (2024) Twigs, Charcoal, and the Death of the Saxon Dyke Myth.

Author’s Biography

Robert John Langdon, a polymathic luminary, emerges as a writer, historian, and eminent specialist in LiDAR Landscape Archaeology.

His intellectual voyage has interwoven with stints as an astute scrutineer for governmental realms and grand corporate bastions, a tapestry spanning British Telecommunications, Cable and Wireless, British Gas, and the esteemed University of London.

A decade hence, Robert’s transition into retirement unfurled a chapter of insatiable curiosity. This phase saw him immerse himself in Politics, Archaeology, Philosophy, and the enigmatic realm of Quantum Mechanics. His academic odyssey traversed the venerable corridors of knowledge hubs such as the Museum of London, University College London, Birkbeck College, The City Literature Institute, and Chichester University.

In the symphony of his life, Robert is a custodian of three progeny and a pair of cherished grandchildren. His sanctuary lies ensconced in the embrace of West Wales, where he inhabits an isolated cottage, its windows framing a vista of the boundless sea – a retreat from the scrutinous gaze of the Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, an amiable clandestinity in the lap of nature’s embrace.

Exploring Prehistoric Britain: A Journey Through Time

My blog delves into the fascinating mysteries of prehistoric Britain, challenging conventional narratives and offering fresh perspectives based on cutting-edge research, particularly using LiDAR technology. I invite you to explore some key areas of my research. For example, the Wansdyke, often cited as a defensive structure, is re-examined in light of new evidence. I’ve presented my findings in my blog post Wansdyke: A British Frontier Wall – ‘Debunked’, and a Wansdyke LiDAR Flyover video further visualizes my conclusions.

My work also often challenges established archaeological dogma. I argue that many sites, such as Hambledon Hill, commonly identified as Iron Age hillforts are not what they seem. My posts Lidar Investigation Hambledon Hill – NOT an ‘Iron Age Fort’ and Unmasking the “Iron Age Hillfort” Myth explore these ideas in detail and offer an alternative view. Similarly, sites like Cissbury Ring and White Sheet Camp, also receive a re-evaluation based on LiDAR analysis in my posts Lidar Investigation Cissbury Ring through time and Lidar Investigation White Sheet Camp, revealing fascinating insights into their true purpose. I have also examined South Cadbury Castle, often linked to the mythical Camelot56.

My research also extends to the topic of ancient water management, including the role of canals and other linear earthworks. I have discussed the true origins of Car Dyke in multiple posts including Car Dyke – ABC News PodCast and Lidar Investigation Car Dyke – North Section, suggesting a Mesolithic origin2357. I also explore the misidentification of Roman aqueducts, as seen in my posts on the Great Chesters (Roman) Aqueduct. My research has also been greatly informed by my post-glacial flooding hypothesis which has helped to inform the landscape transformations over time. I have discussed this hypothesis in several posts including AI now supports my Post-Glacial Flooding Hypothesis and Exploring Britain’s Flooded Past: A Personal Journey

Finally, my blog also investigates prehistoric burial practices, as seen in Prehistoric Burial Practices of Britain and explores the mystery of Pillow Mounds, often mistaken for medieval rabbit warrens, but with a potential link to Bronze Age cremation in my posts: Pillow Mounds: A Bronze Age Legacy of Cremation? and The Mystery of Pillow Mounds: Are They Really Medieval Rabbit Warrens?. My research also includes the astronomical insights of ancient sites, for example, in Rediscovering the Winter Solstice: The Original Winter Festival. I also review new information about the construction of Stonehenge in The Stonehenge Enigma.

Further Reading

For those interested in British Prehistory, visit www.prehistoric-britain.co.uk, a comprehensive resource featuring an extensive collection of archaeology articles, modern LiDAR investigations, and groundbreaking research. The site also includes insights and extracts from the acclaimed Robert John Langdon Trilogy, a series of books exploring Britain during the Prehistoric period. Titles in the trilogy include The Stonehenge Enigma, Dawn of the Lost Civilisation, and The Post Glacial Flooding Hypothesis, offering compelling evidence about ancient landscapes shaped by post-glacial flooding.

To further explore these topics, Robert John Langdon has developed a dedicated YouTube channel featuring over 100 video documentaries and investigations that complement the trilogy. Notable discoveries and studies showcased on the channel include 13 Things that Don’t Make Sense in History and the revelation of Silbury Avenue – The Lost Stone Avenue, a rediscovered prehistoric feature at Avebury, Wiltshire.

In addition to his main works, Langdon has released a series of shorter, accessible publications, ideal for readers delving into specific topics. These include:

• The Ancient Mariners
• Stonehenge Built 8300 BCE
• Old Sarum
• Prehistoric Rivers
• Dykes, Ditches, and Earthworks
• Echoes of Atlantis
• Homo Superior
• 13 Things that Don’t Make Sense in History
• Silbury Avenue – The Lost Stone Avenue
• Offa’s Dyke
• The Stonehenge Enigma
• The Post-Glacial Flooding Hypothesis
• The Stonehenge Hoax
• Dawn of the Lost Civilisation
• Darwin’s Children
• Great Chester’s Roman Aqueduct
• Wansdyke

For active discussions and updates on the trilogy’s findings and recent LiDAR investigations, join our vibrant community on Facebook. Engage with like-minded enthusiasts by leaving a message or contributing to debates in our Facebook Group.

Whether through the books, the website, or interactive videos, we aim to provide a deeper understanding of Britain’s fascinating prehistoric past. We encourage you to explore these resources and uncover the mysteries of ancient landscapes through the lens of modern archaeology.

For more information, including chapter extracts and related publications, visit the Robert John Langdon Author Page. Dive into works such as The Stonehenge Enigma or Dawn of the Lost Civilisation, and explore cutting-edge theories that challenge traditional historical narratives.

Other Blogs